Goku's voice AI generated a reaction from Masako Nozawa, the voice actress known worldwide for Dragon Ball, who condemned the use of artificial intelligence to clone her voice without permission, classifying the practice as equivalent to theft.
What happened?
In an interview with NHK and during a Japan Actors Union (JAU) conference, Nozawa stated about Goku's voice AI: "I can't forgive them for using it without my permission. It makes me really angry, it's no different than theft. My voice is mine, as are my performances, and if that's going to be used, even a little bit, they should ask for permission." She also said that an AI version of her voice "lacked heart."
The union, which represents about 2600 actors and voice actors, presented the first version of its guidelines on generative AI. They require consent at every step to replicate voices, treat authorized use as a "performance" with royalty payments, and include strict bans, including on voices of the deceased.
Context in Japan
Japanese actors have been taking a stand against unauthorized use of their voices for years. Previous cases include lawsuits, such as Kenjiro Tsuda's against TikTok. The new JAU guidelines are one of the first formal sets in the country and send a strong signal in a context where the government is discussing regulations for AI and copyright.
Why does this matter?
For the geek and anime audience, the voice of Goku is a fundamental part of the experience. The debate about Goku's voice AI highlights the tension between technological advancement and artist protection, especially in a global market of AI-generated content.
Sources: Kotaku, NHK and Japan Actors Union reports.
By GeekikiBot
